• Skip to main content

Alcohol Review

Alcohol understanding for all

  • Highlights
  • AR2026
    • AR2025
    • Earlier events
  • Register
  • About
    • Organisers
    • Contact
  • Log In

philcain

Alcohol Review – issue 103, May 31st 2024

January 10, 2024

Find this service useful?
Please join the Alcohol Review‘s supporters who make it possible

In this issue:
News: Alcohol-violence link acknowledged; Tax rise return in Lithuania; UK adds up societal costs; Oregon itemises treatment shortfall: Ontario “boozedoggle”costed; Bihar’s prohibition payoffs; US alcohol levels remain elevated; Alcohol banned at the French Open tennis
Meme stocks: Distilled alcohol messages

Alcohol Review’s first annual conference will be on Thursday November 14th. Early-bird discounts available

This newsletter continues for logged in supporters from any platform. You can retrieve your password using the form below. It is also on Substack.

Supporter login

Lost Password?

Forgot password?

Please enter your email. The password reset link will be provided in your email.

News:

Alcohol-violence link: Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese acknowledged a link between alcohol and family and domestic violence in parliament yesterday.

Tax return: Average alcohol consumption in Lithuania fell by 1.8% to 11.0 litres last year after an alcohol tax  increase led to a 10.6% rise in prices, said the State Data Agency.

UK costings: The broad societal cost of alcohol harm was put at up to £37bn ($47bn) in England and Scotland, with the IAS putting the figure for England at £27bn and Scotland making up the £5-10bn remainder. Around half come from the cost of crime and disorder and a fifth from lost productivity. 

Oregon treatment shortfall: Oregon’s health authority said it would cost nearly $7bn to plug the gaps in its drug and alcohol treatment system, but did not say who should bear the cost.

Canadian “Boozedoggle”: The Liberals in Ontario coined a new word to describe a plan to accelerate the sale of alcohol in convenience stores which they said would cost taxpayers over C$1bn. It does not include the cost of harm from any consumption increase.

Prohibition pluses: A ban on alcohol on India’s Bihar state has prevented 2.4m cases of daily and weekly alcohol consumption and 2.1m cases of intimate partner violence since 2016, said a Lancet study. It does not recommend such a ban.

Pandemic plateau: Alcohol consumption continued at a level around a fifth higher in people with alcohol use disorder compared to before the covid pandemic, according to Millennium Health Signals Alert. The US, like Australia and the UK, has seen an enormous surge in alcohol deaths.

Not tennis: Alcohol was banned in the stands at the French Open tennis after some unseemly behaviour in the crowd, like allegedly spitting chewing gum at a player.

Meme stocks: A few eye-catching posts to highlight some key information
Drinking less alcohol leads to better health 
Avoid pressuring other people to drink alcohol
Alcohol lowers mood and increases anxiety
Alcohol calories/ml ≈ cooking oil
Alcohol is not useful

Partial preview (sign up for full newsletter)

Guest post: Most US women don’t know alcohol’s health risks

January 10, 2024

Targeted marketing may play a role in increasing alcohol consumption among women.
Lisa Schaetzle/Moment via Getty Images

By Monica Swahn, Kennesaw State University and Ritu Aneja, University of Alabama at Birmingham

Did you know that casual drinks with friends or having a “wine mom” moment to unwind could actually be nudging up your risk for breast cancer? It sounds like a buzzkill. But it’s a truth that many might not know: Alcohol actually causes breast cancer.

The World Health Organization and the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism lay it out pretty clearly: Compared to those who don’t drink, just one drink a day can bump up your breast cancer risk by 5% to 9%.

As alcohol and cancer researchers, we wanted to learn more about what women actually know about the connection between alcohol and breast cancer, especially since alcohol use has been increasing among women.

Explaining the knowledge gap
For our recently published research, we asked more than 5,000 women ages 18 and older across the US in 2021 about whether they were aware of the link between alcohol consumption and breast cancer. We also asked them about their drinking habits and other health and background factors.

We were surprised to find that only one in four of these women knew that alcohol is a risk factor for breast cancer. Even more concerning, 35% didn’t think there’s any link at all. Another 40% were sitting on the fence about it.

Closeup of person cupping glass of whisky in two hands
Fully understanding alcohol’s health risks can help people make more informed choices about how they consume it.
aire images/Moment via Getty Images

We also saw a knowledge gap based on age, education and race.

Younger, more educated women and those facing alcohol-related issues were more in the know about the link between alcohol and breast cancer risk than older, less educated women and those who have not drank in the past year. Black women were also less aware of the risk between alcohol and breast cancer compared to white women.

Drinking less lowers breast cancer risk
Despite the attempts of alcohol researchers, health officials and advocates to inform women about alcohol’s risks and its connection to breast cancer, our findings show that this message isn’t getting across to most people.

There are also pervasive myths about the benefits of alcohol use because some people don’t want to know that drinking can cause harm and don’t want to talk about it. As a result, many women simply don’t know or are uncertain of the health harms alcohol causes.

A comprehensive communication approach to increase awareness of alcohol’s harms and its link to cancer can help support and encourage women to make healthier choices regarding alcohol use.

Educational campaigns can help inform people from diverse backgrounds about alcohol and breast cancer risk.

Warning labels can help increase awareness of alcohol’s health risks.

Policy changes with respect to alcohol marketing, access and availability can also make a difference in people’s drinking patterns.

These policies may also address the “feminization” of alcohol marketing, which intentionally entices women to drink and purchase alcohol by normalizing or glamorizing heavy alcohol use and ignoring the health risks and harm caused. The World Health Organization recommends stricter rules on alcohol advertising and marketing along with higher taxes on alcohol to reduce alcohol-related harm.

Today’s culture may normalize dealing with life’s stresses by popping the cork.

But cutting down on alcohol is something that can make a difference in breast cancer risk. Stepping back and thinking about alcohol’s effects on your health can help you make informed choices about whether to drink or not.The Conversation ■

Monica Swahn, Dean of the Wellstar College of Health and Human Services, Kennesaw State University and Ritu Aneja, Professor of Clinical and Diagnostic Sciences, Associate Dean of Research and Innovation in the School of Health Professions, University of Alabama at Birmingham. This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

The alcohol “unlearning curve”

January 10, 2024

Alcohol has a reverse learning curve in which greater exposure tends to lessen our intuitive understanding of it rather than improving it. Alcohol Companion and Alcohol for Nerds were written to help rectify this unlearning process. ◼️

Just one in five Brits know alcohol basics

January 10, 2024

Alcohol calories similar to cooking oil

Just one in five Brits know how many calories are in wine or beer or know the official low-risk drinking guidelines, according to a Yougov survey from campaigners calling for labelling to inform them.

“It is absolutely unacceptable that the alcohol industry is able to get away with not providing full information on its packaging,” said Holly Gabriel from Action on Sugar, a view echoed by campaign partners Alcohol Health Alliance.

Alcohol is a carcinogenic drug of dependence with a calorie density comparable to cooking oil, causing a wide range of common physical and mental health problems and mistakes ranging from the deadly to the embarrassing.

But a legal loophole means alcoholic drinks labels need to contain less nutritional information than orange juice. Alcohol suppliers compound the problem by omitting low-risk drinking advice to protect shareholder profits. 

Labels provide crucial information to consumers, but alcoholic drinks labels need only show alcohol content, allergens and container size. Campaigners see an upcoming consultation as a way to put this right.

Our individual decision making has major limitations in curbing harm from an addictive drug, but denying us basic pieces information is not a solution. ■

Four percent of cancers linked to alcohol

January 10, 2024

One in 25 cancers is linked to alcohol consumption, with men accounting for three quarters of cases, according to a global study in Lancet Oncology.

“Public health strategies, such as reduced alcohol availability, labelling alcohol products with a health warning, and marketing bans could reduce rates of alcohol-driven cancer,” says Harriet Rumgay of the International Agency for Research on Cancer, also recommending higher taxes and minimum pricing.

The estimates would mean 740,000 cancer cases globally were linked to alcohol last year, with heavy drinkers contributing bar far the most. But there is no risk-free level of alcohol drinking and cancer. Low-level drinkers were one-in-seven of alcohol-linked cancer cases.

“It is safest not to drink alcohol, but if you do, you should stick to the UK Chief Medical Officers’ low-risk guidelines which is to drink no more than 14 units a week [or 140ml of alcohol] on a regular basis,” said Professor Sir Ian Gilmore, Chair of the UK’s Alcohol Health Alliance.

Cancers of the oesophagus, liver, and breast accounted for most of the cases. Alcohol damages DNA and affects hormone production, which can contribute to cancer development, as well as worsen the cancer-causing effects of substances like tobacco.

In the UK the alcohol-lined cancer rate was the global average of 4%, with 16,800 cases; The US, 3%, with 52,700 cases; China 6%, 282,300; Germany 4%, 21,500 cases; and France 5%, 20,000 cases. The percentage of alcohol-linked cancer cases were reckoned to be highest in Mongolia, at 10%, from 560 cases, and lowest in Kuwait, where it was 0%, with just a few cases.

The study made its estimate by looking at alcohol intake in 2010 and the number of cases of cancers known to be linked to alcohol last year. Some suspect the research may underestimate alcohol’s contribution to cancer cases, because a quarter of alcohol purchases are not captured by government figures. ■

Grey-area drinking: pandemic’s heavy drinkers are ignoring the health risks

January 10, 2024

by Ian Hamilton, University of York

Increased drinking during the pandemic has created a group of people who don’t see themselves as alcoholics but have difficulty abstaining from alcohol for any length of time. This group, starting to be called grey-area drinkers, are at risk of alcohol-related health problems.

The relatively new term “grey-area drinking” describes people who consume more than a moderate amount of alcohol but don’t meet the criteria for dependence. Although they might not drink every day or have a drink first thing in the morning (the widely held view of an alcoholic) they are likely to be preoccupied with alcohol and have difficulty giving up. Many of these people don’t view themselves as in need of help.

Any widespread increase in levels of alcohol consumption matters. While most people are familiar with the risk of dependence there are a range of severe physical health problems associated with increased alcohol consumption that they are not so aware of. These include heart disease and a range of cancers, including bowel and breast.

Litres of alcohol bought in shops from April 2018 to 1 March 2021

Source: Public Health England

Although overall consumption of alcohol has been slowly declining in recent years there is emerging evidence that some people have increased their consumption. The heaviest-buying segment of the population increased their purchasing by 5.3 million litres of alcohol (+14.3%) from 2019 to 2021. At the same time physical harm from alcohol has been increasing, with a significant rise in hospital admissions and alcohol-related deaths.

Public Health England collated the results of 18 surveys of self-reported alcohol consumption during the pandemic. Between 11% and 37% reported drinking less but between 14% and 26% of people reported drinking more than usual. This is especially concerning given that we know most people underestimate how much they drink by up to 40% in these surveys.

Pubs were closed during the pandemic, so drinking at home increased. This may have encouraged drinking in large quantities as people tend to pour larger measures of alcohol when drinking at home compared to the measures they are given in bars.

Evidence found that those who experienced stress during the pandemic increased the amount of alcohol they drank and how often. One international study exploring alcohol consumption during periods of self-isolation found that it was British drinkers who were most likely to increase the amount of alcohol they consumed – which they say was due to elevated levels of COVID-related stress.

These surveys found a noticeable increase in consumption for some once the pandemic began. Those who were drinking below the governments recommended weekly limits, continued to stay within these limits. However those who were already drinking above the 14 units a week increased their consumption.

Current UK guidance suggests no more than 14 units of alcohol should be consumed in a week (see illustration).

UK guidance on alcohol units.
Department of Health

Levels of hazardous drinking are considered to be more than 50 units a week for men and 35 units for women. Evidence suggests that there was a 59% increase in those reporting drinking at these levels compared to before the pandemic.

Some argue that the alcohol industry embraces the perception that the majority of people drink responsibly. This has been one of the industry’s main arguments for resisting greater regulation. The industry points to the need for personal responsibility rather than corporate responsibility, although they fail to define what responsible drinking is. This shifts the onus onto the individual to make a change to their drinking habits rather than requiring the industry to make changes to its marketing or promotion techniques.

At a time when there is a clear need to tackle increased alcohol consumption, funding for specialist treatment and support has been withering. Some sections of the alcohol industry were encouraged to increase marketing spend as it would be more effective than ever. Some analysis shows that alcohol companies have also used lockdown for targeted social media activity. And the alcohol industry’s multi-million pound spend on marketing is huge, compared with the budget for public health messages, a truly David and Goliath struggle.

There has been little mention of alcohol or our unhealthy relationship with it during the pandemic by the government. For instance, off-licences were deemed to be essential services and stayed open during lockdown. The alcohol industry has proved to be adept at influencing government policy in its favour.

As treatment budgets are cut industry marketing increases and there is nothing to suggest that there will be any reduction in demand for hospital treatment due to alcohol or, sadly, coroners recording yet more alcohol-related deaths.The Conversation ■

Ian Hamilton, Associate Professor of Addiction, University of York This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 16
  • Page 17
  • Page 18
  • Page 19
  • Page 20
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 50
  • Go to Next Page »

Copyright © 2026 · Phil Cain Impressum