• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Alcohol Review

Alcohol understanding for all

  • Highlights
    • Messages
    • Newsletters
    • AR Live
  • Events
    • AR2026
    • AR2025
    • Next year’s event
    • Earlier events
  • Join
  • About
    • Organisers
    • Contact
  • Log In

philcain

The case for pure free time hedonism

February 14, 2025

Advertisers know full well humans are feeling-driven creatures. We could usefully resolve to harness this fact ourselves by systematically pursuing the feelings we want from our free time.

The New Year is when many of us try to change our habits, resolving to cut back on alcohol, save money and exercise more. But we might also usefully take a step back to ensure our free time satisfies our appetite for feelings and sensation.

Free time is a precious commodity, of course, but it also poses a very tricky problem: How do we best fill it? There is such a vast range of realistic options available to us–from transcendental meditation, to crochet, to kendo–but how can we choose or decide if the choice is a good one?

Having a good way to choose could mean we spend our free time better. I suggest the feelings and states of mind we want as a goal. This is a route to a form of Epicurean hedonism, where we make our own idea of happiness top priority. This is more likely a rich mixture of interwoven feelings and mental states rather than constant euphoria.

It avoids necessarily setting ourselves measurable criteria like, say, getting a better 100m backstroke time or mastering another 20 chords on the ukulele. Having too many concrete deliverables like these can make our free time feel too much like work time. Making a hobby feel like a job is to undermine the freedom of our free time.

Marketing and advertising is by its nature highly compelling and persuasive, but also an unreliable guide. Businesses’ main goal is to make money, not to help us make the choices which serve us best. Similarly, love us as they may, our friends and family can urge us to do things serving their interests or fulfill their preconceived ideas of what we want.

The alternative
Instead we could make our free time choices from scratch. We first try to define the outcome we want–in this case the feelings and states of mind–and then work back to what might deliver it.

Take a blank sheet of paper and pen and brainstorm, trying to focus on what we want to experience. We should try to be clear that they are what we want, not what other people want. We are all different.. Write them down haphazardly as you think of them. Some may be new or surprising. Or we might find we dig up feelings we had long in the past.

The second stage is to work on delivering this list. We can try to think of activities where you had the feelings or mental states on our list. Maybe they are things we have not done since we were children or teenagers. Be honest and put them down in a list. Check back to see which feelings and states are covered by your activities and try and fill in any gaps.

Perhaps you might have a state of mind “feeling fresh”. This could make  positive activity out of not doing something, like avoiding alcohol, smoking or cream buns. You might also find an activity has given you feelings you do not want alongside the ones you do. In this case, perhaps there is a way to approach it differently, “Play guitar, purely for fun.”

Maybe there are some of the objectives we wrote down which are not covered by activities. In this case we might need to think of some activity experiments that we think might fill that gap. We also might need to thin out the activity list and prioritise.

Together our two lists are the beginning of a positive feeling-focussed mix of activity, using our own direct experience to achieve what we want. We can harness a fact advertisers widely use to serve business ends to serve our own. ■

Alcohol Review – Issue 110, January 31st 2025

January 31, 2025

Read on the homepage
Become a full subscriber

In this issue:
Invitation: Join Alcohol Review 2025
News: Outgoing Biden US Surgeon General sparks cancer warning debate; Investor drops alcohol stake; Psychedelic efforts hit high; Lo-no policy warning ignored; App assessed.
Features: Opinion: Alcohol-free beer hype is unhelpful; The case for pure free time hedonism; Put alcohol pleasure in perspective

Invitation

Alcohol Review 2025: Winning the narrative, sharing the benefits. With live sessions from acclaimed author Grant Ennis and UK public health leader Alice Wiseman. Impactful Spotlight sessions will highlight a series of cutting-edge developments. Full subscribers go free.
Subscribe, register and propose a session.

News

Outgoing Biden US Surgeon General sparks global cancer warning debate: Alcohol’s cancer risk made global headlines when outgoing Biden-appointed US Surgeon General said that alcohol products should carry warning labels. It is unclear which direction the nascent Trump administration will go with alcohol policy. In the meantime Pennsylvania House Representative Jose Giral proposed a bill which would require alcohol products in the Commonwealth to carry a warning. And Alaska revisited a plan to use signs to warn about cancer at point of sale. A second report was released to inform this year’s highly contested guideline revision. In India, meanwhile, the Bombay High Court last week notified central and state governments of a public interest litigation from a 24-year-old campaigner who wants to see alcohol cancer warning labels.

Investor drops alcohol stake: Investment manager Terry Smith dropped a long-held stake in alcohol giant Diageo, citing concerns over its new management team and the possibility that weight-loss drugs will reduce alcohol demand.

Psychedelic efforts hit high: Shares in the UK’s Solvonis Therapeutics Plc jumped after the FDA said it would allow its ketamine-based drug for alcohol problems to progress to phase two clinical trials. Separately, dimethyltryptamine (DMT), the active element in the traditional South American drug ayahuasca, is also to be investigated.

Lo-no policy warning ignored: Low-alcohol products carrying alcohol brands should face the same marketing restrictions as full-strength counterparts and always be cheaper, says new guidance from the UK’s Alcohol Health Alliance. Their producers should also not be part of policy discussion. This suggestion has yet to be heeded, however, with Public Health Minister Andrew Gwynne MP this week joining an alcohol industry lobbying exercise promoting the health benefits of low alcohol drinks. AR argued that a fixation on unproven benefits of low alcohol drinks pose a potential barrier to effective action.

App assessed: A study found that large-scale promotion of an app called “Drink Less” could reduce alcohol-related deaths by 4,600 and hospital admissions by 188,400 over the next 20 years,  saving the NHS £590m ($730m).

Features

Opinion: Alcohol-free beer hype is unhelpful
Heavy marketing has created a buzz around alcohol-free beer diverting vital public attention from surging rates of alcohol harm. The stakes are too high to let commercial hype eclipse evidence-based action.

Preview for full subscribers
The case for pure free time hedonism
The New Year is when many of us try to change our habits, resolving to cut back on alcohol, save money and exercise more. But we might also usefully take a step back to ensure our free time satisfies our appetite for feelings and sensation.

Message of the month

Put alcohol pleasure in perspective

Heavy marketing can make it seem that alcohol drinking is essential in pleasure when it really only plays a bit-part, and often a negative one. If we are serious about enjoying our spare time we might benefit from a more open, creative approach, as argued above. ■

Put alcohol pleasure in perspective

January 30, 2025

Heavy marketing can make it seem that alcohol drinking is essential in pleasure when it really only plays a bit-part, and often a negative one. If we are serious about enjoying our spare time we might benefit from a more open, creative approach, as outlined here. ■

Try changing your personal alcohol environment

January 5, 2025

Policies and individual choices are normally seen as completely separate, but in reality they merge. So why not ring in the New Year by road-testing some effective alcohol strategies at home?

We all set some rules, or policies, for our homes, for example. Few let outdoor shoes go beyond a certain threshold. Weaponry, road vehicles, fire, smoke and harmful chemicals also typically have their perimeters.

These are not prohibitions. They are regulations. By crossing borders we can have access to all of the things verboten in some places. Out there is a target-shooting, tanker driver who only smokes when scrubbed up, unarmed on the veranda.

The regulatory systems of our private lives often operate on the basis of unwritten policies picked up from parents, partners, and common sense. They offer an easy way to keep a safe, livable and inexpensive environment. 

These policies are typically adopted and applied without any democratic mandate. But we will also, sometimes, decide to set new policies, often through a process of thought, negotiation and compromise.

So why not consider adding evidence-based alcohol policies to the mix. We might take, for instance, government policies reckoned to curb harm at a population level as a starting point: increase the price, and reduce availability and marketing.

A few calculations might allow us to set a minimum unit price. This we might do by identifying products which are below it. Or we might levy a alcohol per unit “tax”, setting aside revenue for household running costs and infrastructure.

Implementation of these might be complicated. Perhaps an easier option would be reducing alcohol availability. We might bar keeping alcohol at home; Or to limit the stockpile; Or not put what we have in the fridge; Or, maybe, not to buy online. 

Limiting home availability would have a knock-on effect. It bumps up the price of alcohol at home, imposing on inhabitants the cost of leaving the house to buy it. This also gives us a chance for second thoughts. 

Reducing marketing exposure is trickier, because alcohol advertising targets us without our consent. But we can reduce it, by putting alcohol brands out of sight at home. We can also filter some online ads. And we can try to avoid alcohol retail.

Harmful levels of drinking are best addressed with the aid of medical advice. But making our own environments less alcohol loaded makes low-risk drinking the easy option. And home drinking is the source of the bulk of alcohol harm.

We all set and live by policies to create environments which are safe and best serve our needs. We need politicians to do this for us in environments we share. ■

Alcohol Review – Issue 109, December 23rd 2024

December 23, 2024

Read on the homepage

In this issue: Finns told less alcohol, better health; UK alcohol “catastrophe” highlighted’; US issues exceptionalist health report; Australian delivery proposals hailed; Saudi 2034 stadium drinking ban; Nigeria sachet ban enforcement

Register now for Alcohol Review 2025, a uniquely accessible, solution-focussed forum for everyone involved tackling alcohol harm worldwide. Showcase your research and action alongside an agenda-setting live online event. 

News:

Finns told less alcohol, better health: New guidelines say drinking alcohol is not recommended for anyone for health and that any amount should be “as small as possible”. For children, young people, and pregnant and lactating women alcohol is “not recommended at all”. Seperately, South Korea’s health ministry said it was thinking of adding a label to say something similar. 

UK post-covid “catastrophe” highlighted: An alliance of 60 UK NGOs called for minimum alcohol pricing in England to help address a “catastrophic” 42% rise in alcohol deaths since the covid pandemic. The Labour government has so far done nothing to stem the tide of alcohol deaths, keeping alcohol taxes unchanged in real terms despite being elected on a manifesto saying it would focus on preventing health problems. Its Conservative predecessor actively stoked the surge in alcohol deaths with years of real terms alcohol tax cuts. Separately, figures showed alcohol deaths rose by almost two-thirds in the last decade across Northern Ireland where minimum pricing is on the agenda.

Exceptionalist US alcohol health report: A committee criticised for having financial ties to the alcohol industry and a lack of expertise said in a pre-publication report that moderate alcohol drinkers have a 16% lower all-cause mortality risk than non-drinkers. The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine committee’s pronouncement contradicts global authorities on the subject of alcohol, like the WHO, which says alcohol harms health even at low doses because it is carcinogenic. The report is expected to inform decision on updated dietary guidance.

Australia delivery restriction proposals hailed: Alcohol harm reduction campaigners welcomed proposed alcohol laws in South Australian which prioritise the health and wellbeing of women and children. Among the moves would be restricting alcohol delivery times, with late night alcohol deliveries thought to worsen domestic violence. Separately alcohol harm NGO FARE Australia announced the departure of its CEO of five years Caterina Giorgi, who will continue until the end of February.

Saudi World Cup stadium drinking ban: Football fans will be banned from drinking alcohol in stadiums at the 2034 World Cup in Saudi Arabia, the Guardian reported. It has not been announced whether co-branded alcohol-free beer will be allowed as it was at the Qatar tournament after a stadium alcohol ban was seemingly decided last minute. This gave the brand enormous global live TV and editorial exposure to audiences, includng many children and young people.

Nigeria sachet ban enforcement begins: The National Agency for Food and Drug Administration and Control seized alcoholic beverages packaged in sachets and small plastic bottles the southern Delta State this month. The agency said it expected to make more raids. Reports of the outlawed products still being openly sold in Lagos suggest an uphill battle.

Message of the month:

Alcohol, less is more: Reducing alcohol intake reduces the risks it poses to our health from the smallest amount. Fewer people know this than should. ■

Opinion: Alcohol-free beer hype is unhelpful

November 19, 2024

Heavy marketing has created a buzz around alcohol-free beer diverting vital public attention from surging rates of alcohol harm. The stakes are too high to let commercial hype eclipse evidence-based action.

Alcohol deaths were up 33% on pre-pandemic levels in 2022 in the UK, for example. This astonished a BBC Radio 4 news anchor in May, so it is fair to assume the general public is probably less aware still of this dire situation. The US post-pandemic alcohol death surge is similar, at 31%, yet media coverage is sparse and the political response faltering. The WHO warned in summer “there has been little or no progress” in reducing alcohol consumption and harms in Europe.

As the death toll mounts the public is reminded, almost daily, of the success of alcohol-free beer. An alcohol-free beer garden at Munich’s Oktoberfest, for example, gained worldwide coverage, as if it were a sign humanity was turning the page on alcohol. And everything from the Olympics to Formula 1 promotes alcohol brands in alcohol-free clothing.  The unspoken implication is that this is a sign of spontaneous progress.

The rise of alcohol free beer story satisfies our fascination for novelties and craving for miraculous solutions. What’s not to like about a story about, say, a tiny island of non-drinkers in a giant sea of drinking at a Munich beer festival. Is this not a sure sign a quiet moderation revolution is afoot? “The problem is taking care of itself,” we can be tempted to think, “One less thing to worry about.”

But, then again, this positive impression is highly questionable. There is also the very real possibility that the alcohol-free Oktoberfest beer garden is a gimmick to pre-empt criticism and generate positive coverage. In this, it was a triumph, regardless of its popularity. And, more broadly, there is no firm evidence that alcohol-free beer makes any meaningful difference to alcohol consumption or alcohol harm.  We can be thankful some research is due in the next six months or so to quantify the effect, if there is any.

Nevertheless the media’s tireless trumpeting of alcohol-free beer, often from alcohol industry organisations. It is now “common sense” for non-specialists to see alcohol free beer as part of the solution to alcohol harm. In many cases we are falling for Potemkin villages constructed to show the market has the alcohol problem in hand. This is artful public relations triumphing over rational scientific and journalistic enquiry.

Alcohol-free beer has grown to quench a sizable share of the collective thirst in Europe. In France, Germany and Hungary alcohol-free beer is about 8% of the volume of beer in general. This is clearly progress, right? Well, again, maybe, maybe not. We do not know if alcohol-free beer replaces regular beer or if it is in reality chipping into soft drink sales. We might reasonably ask ourselves if alcohol producers would spend vast sums that cannibalise the sales of their core product? 

On an individual level there are more questions. The taste, look and smell of alcohol free beer can prompt some people to crave an alcoholic drink. And alcohol-free beer ads expose audiences including children and people trying to avoid alcohol drinking triggers. Alcohol free spinoffs duck advertising rules which would prohibit advertising the main alcoholic brand. And the imagery of alcohol free beer drinking means sparkling stock photos of attractive people in alcohol drinking situations are still fine.

Alcohol free beer also keeps drinking at the centre of the story. But people who try to avoid alcohol often find alternative activities far easier than attending alcohol drinking occasions sober. Why do we not see more coverage of the benefits of activities which have nothing to do with imbibing liquids, alcoholic or otherwise?  

Meanwhile alcohol interests enter alcohol free spaces, like schools, with self-serving “education” initiatives. And when there is an initiative like Men’s Sheds, mostly for middle-aged and older men to do some DIY, alcohol interests rocks up with some “education”. Tragically it is exactly this demographic who die most often from alcohol related causes.

Alcohol free beer is not all bad, of course. A lot of people like the taste of alcohol-free beer and it is not loaded with calories. And it can help us feel at ease avoiding alcohol at alcohol-dominated social occasions. Holding something that looks like a beer can flag we are ready to be sociable and placebo effects can be helpful to us. And there are some dedicated alcohol-free-only brands that might reduce triggering.

There is nothing inherently wrong with a new category of non-alcoholic drinks. But no alcohol-free beverage is automatically a remedy for large scale alcohol health problems. Our working assumption should be that the effect is minimal until proven otherwise. And the focus of media and policymakers should be on policies which are known to work, like those on price, availability and marketing.

We might also usefully look at promoting activities which do not revolve around drinking liquids of any type, like making things in sheds, for example. We can usefully facilitate these activities and protect them from alcohol marketing. This involves finding new ways to fund alcohol free spaces beyond selling drinks. Alcohol free drinks bars have struggled to survive, but alcohol free spaces offering games and other activities appear to have done rather better.

Hoping alcohol-free beer is reducing alcohol problems without evidence risks costing more lives. The stakes are too high to let uncertainty delay the implementation of evidence-based action to reduce record levels of harm. ■

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 16
  • Page 17
  • Page 18
  • Page 19
  • Page 20
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 57
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

  • Bluesky
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • WhatsApp

Copyright © 2026 · Phil Cain Impressum

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}
Loading Comments...