• Skip to main content

Alcohol Review

Alcohol understanding for all

  • Highlights
  • AR2026
    • AR2025
    • Earlier events
  • Register
  • About
    • Organisers
    • Contact
  • Log In

philcain

Experts pan UK ten-year plan for broken prevention promise

July 3, 2025

The UK government’s ten-year plan for the NHS today angered experts having omitted the main evidence-based preventive policies to tackle alcohol harm.

In its election-winning manifesto last year Labour pledged to focus on ways to prevent the major causes of ill-health.

Instead the plan opted to back new standards for alcohol labelling and growth of the no-lo market, with little evidence either policy is likely to have a significant impact on on the UK’s record levels of alcohol harm.

The leadup to the plan’s launch saw a fractious public debate about its contents with alcohol interests through leaks and headlines. This raises questions as to how proposals have come to be made which to do not reflect election promises.

“It’s frankly embarrassing to launch a ‘prevention’ plan that ignores the most effective ways to prevent alcohol harm,” said the Institute of Alcohol Studies’s Jem Roberts referring to price, availabilty and marketing controls.

“This is not just a missed opportunity–it is a dereliction of duty,” said Professor Sir Ian Gilmore, chair of the Alcohol Health Alliance UK, adding there is little evidence no-los cut alcohol consumption. But he welcomed steps towards better labelling.

The plan was “hugely disappointing”, according to Joe Marley of Alcohol Change UK, while also welcoming its commitment to mandatory health warnings and nutritional information on alcohol product labels.

“In spite of lots of talk about moving towards prevention rather than treatment, there is basically no meaningful alcohol prevention policy here,” said alcohol researcher Colin Angus.

On labelling the government says it will “introduce a mandatory requirement for alcoholic drinks to display consistent nutritional information and health warning messages.” It says warnings have “proven effective” in South Korea.

The 168-page report also says that it will “support innovative community level innovations”, including peer-led suport groups and coaching. ■

Alcohol among biggest causes of preventable EU death

July 1, 2025

Alcohol-specific disorders and poisonings was the fourth biggest preventable cause of death in the EU in 2022, after lung cancer, heart disease and covid, according statistics from Eurostat.

The rate was especially high in Estonia, Latvia and Hungary according to Eurostat’s analysis.

“Nanny state” cliche long past retirement age

June 26, 2025

The nanny cliche is surely well past retirement age? It is at least as inaccurate as it is worn out. What kind of nanny increases tax on something or reduces its availability? None. And who actually spends billions telling us what to do? Commercial advertisers. ■

Alcohol Review – Issue 114, June 20th 2025

June 20, 2025

Read original and subscribe for more

In this issue: US alcohol inclusion call; Heart benefits rejected; Lobbyist’s credentials queried; Tax plan Vietnam; New cancer risk identified. Why alcohol is bad injury medicine; US research funding cuts itemised. Man quiz.

Alcohol Review 2025: Watch takeaways and new session highlights from UK public health leader Alice Wiseman on pushing back against the alcohol industry at the local level. Full event recordings now available with the new monthly subscription.

News

Alcohol inclusion: “Alcohol kills more Americans each year than opioids and guns combined,” noted 24 NGOs which called on the Trump administration to make alcohol measures part of its efforts to reduce chronic disease. Alcohol harm reduction has so far been notably absent from US health plans. Alcohol Review this month itemised $31m research funding cuts.

Benefit claim rejected: The European Heart Network NGO formally recognised alcohol as a modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular disease and rejected “any claim that alcohol consumption, at any level, offers cardiovascular benefits.” Separately, the American Heart Association took a more hesitant step in the same direction saying, “It remains unknown whether drinking is part of a healthy lifestyle.”

Lobbyist queried: The credentials of the UK’s Night Time Industries Association are questionable, according to an investigation by investigative newsletter Democracy for Sale. Despite this the outfit has been granted high-level ministerial meetings and funds an all-party parliamentary group.

Vietnam tax hike: Vietnam is set to raise tax on alcoholic products over 20% from 65% to 90% by 2031. Tax on products below this strength threshold will rise from 35% to 60%. The WHO welcomed the move, but critics warned it still incentivises stronger products because the tax does not increase with total alcohol content.

Tax harmony: The East African Community agreed to harmonise alcohol excise duty at $6 per litre of alcohol in the product, regardless of the product.

Telling inconsistency: Recent alcohol industry statements show the “essential conflict of interest between alcohol industry economic objectives and public health goals”, said a new report from two leading UK NGOs.

New cancer: A large-scale study found a “modest positive association” between alcohol intake and pancreatic cancer. This suggests an eighth alcohol cancer risk, on top of breast, colorectal, esophagus, liver, mouth, throat (pharynx) and voice box (larynx).

Features

Five reasons to give up alcohol when injured
Current research shows there is no safe threshold of alcohol consumption during injury rehabilitation, according to sports scientist John Kiely, with even low-to-moderate drinking impairing athletic performance and injury recovery.

US research funding cuts itemised
The Trump administration has stopped funding at least 34 alcohol research projects promised $31m, with 58% of the funds still to be paid out, according to statistics collated by Alcohol Review. Around three-quarters of those nixed involve studies of sexual and gender minorities.

Mens health special

Quiz: Can you name the famous men who didn’t drink?

■

Five reasons you should give up alcohol if you’re recovering from an injury

June 14, 2025

by John Kiely

Rest, rehab and patience areJohn Kiely, University of Limerickcornerstones of injury recovery. But should quitting alcohol be a part of any recovery plan? This is what England cricket captain Ben Stokes has done – saying he’s given up alcohol in a bid to quickly recover from a serious hamstring injury.

While this may seem extreme, emerging research shows that even small amounts of alcohol can interrupt recovery and delay healing in five key ways:

1. Disrupting immune function
Alcohol disrupts immune cells’ ability to reach and repair injured tissues – slowing the regeneration of healthy muscle, tendons and ligaments. This delays the clean-up of damaged cells and also prolongs swelling and sensitivity, which further delays the process of repair.

The effect of heavy drinking (more than four or five drinks at one time) on the immune system can leave your body vulnerable to infection and delay repair for between three to five days afterwards. Even moderate drinking (one to three drinks at one time) stalls tissue regeneration and prolongs swelling and tenderness in the injured area.

2. Interfering with muscle rebuilding
Muscle protein synthesis – the process of repairing and rebuilding muscle – is reduced for 24 to 48 hours after even moderate alcohol consumption. In one study, muscle protein synthesis was shown to be reduced by 24-37% after drinking.

When this process is impaired, muscle regeneration slows. This results in persisting weakness, soreness and greater susceptibility to re-injury.

3. Delaying bone and tissue healing
When bones, ligaments, tendons and muscles are damaged, signals from these injured tissues trigger natural repair processes. But alcohol disrupts these signalling pathways and interferes with the body’s natural repair mechanisms, delaying healing and increasing swelling and scarring of the injured tissues.

Heavy drinking can prolong healing from a bone fracture by one to two weeks, and extend recovery from sprains and strains by two to three weeks.

4. Disrupting hormonal balance
Hormones are chemical messengers that coordinate many of the body’s recovery processes – including tissue repair, inflammation and muscle growth. Two especially helpful healing hormones are testosterone and growth hormone. Both help rebuild muscle and other connective tissues after injury.

Alcohol lowers circulating levels of these hormones and blunts the body’s ability to regenerate damaged tissues.

At the same time, alcohol raises cortisol levels. Cortisol is the body’s primary stress hormone. Elevated cortisol levels convince the brain that there’s an immediate threat. The brain subsequently seeks to mobilise available energy in preparation for a “fight” or “flight” response.

Spikes in cortisol increase energy availability by diverting energy away from other bodily functions – such as injury recovery. Cortisol also promotes the break down of healthy tissues (especially muscle) into simpler chemicals that can be rapidly converted to energy. These imbalances can persist for days after drinking and significantly slow tissue repair.

5. Increasing risks of re-injury
Clear communication between the brain and body is essential for smooth, precise and coordinated movement. But alcohol interferes with this communication.

As a result, coordination, balance and reaction times all plummet. The subtle movement impairments caused by even moderate drinking can linger for a couple of days afterwards. These increase the risk of movement errors and re-injury to the already vulnerable tissues.

Alcohol and injury recovery
Current research illustrates that there’s no safe threshold of alcohol consumption during rehabilitation. Even low-to-moderate drinking impairs athletic performance and injury recovery for a couple of days, depending on the dose, the person and the aspect of recovery being measured.

Binge drinking (periods of abstinence followed by consuming four or five drinks in one session) causes substantial short-term damage. Low-to-moderate drinking causes subtler disruptions, but these disruptions typically happen more frequently.

Stokes’ decision to abstain from alcohol is not an overreaction – it’s a clear-headed, evidence-led commitment to optimal recovery. As new evidence reshapes our understanding of alcohol’s multiple impacts, the message is simple: rehabilitation doesn’t happen in the pub. Whether you’re a professional athlete, a recreational runner or an enthusiastic “weekend warrior”, every drink counts.

When returning from an injury, the less you drink, the better your chances of a complete recovery. If a rapid and complete recovery is your goal, then less is better, and none is best.

Deciding to drink alcohol during rehabilitation is a personal choice. But if healing is the priority, one of the simplest, most controllable ways to skew the odds in your favour is to follow Stokes’ lead and skip that drink.The Conversation

Note: John Kiely, Department of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, University of Limerick. This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license.

Quiz: Can you name the famous men who didn’t drink?

June 13, 2025

Can you name the famous men pictured above who succeeded without alcohol? Alcohol harm to men is nothing new but it can be reduced with better policies and understanding

Click to reveal the answers

From top left: Bruce Lee, Sir Stanley Matthews, Ernesto “Che” Guevara, Frank Zappa, Abraham Lincoln, Teddy Roosevelt, Thomas Edison, David Lloyd George, Mahatma Gandhi, Richard Feynman, Muhammad Ali, Don Bradman, George Bernhard Shaw. ■

Have you got any good examples we have missed? Let us know.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 5
  • Page 6
  • Page 7
  • Page 8
  • Page 9
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 50
  • Go to Next Page »

Copyright © 2026 · Phil Cain Impressum